ASYMMETRICAL INFORMATION AND HOOKER-NOMICS

Assigning a price to a product is always tricky. But what if the product is illegal and the value subjective? Allison Schrager discusses the matter with a happily self-employed prostitute. “I’ve always wanted my own business,” says Andrea ...
Special to MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE
Andrea, an attractive, petite red-head, with a warm smile and a degree from a top Canadian university, sits across from me, sipping an herbal tea. She has been working as an independent, high-end prostitute for the last four months. I ask her how she decided to set her fee, now at $500 per hour.
How does a supplier determine a price?
Like most independent escorts in the New York metropolitan area, Andrea advertises on the Eros guide, an online listing service. She is in the VIP section, which Eros describes as, “A very special limited list of entertainers”. To be listed as an Eros VIP, Andrea shells out about $200 more per month, on top of the regular monthly fee of $175. (The cost of being listed varies in each city, and VIP add-ons can cost more.) This is her way of signalling that she is a high-end product, offering better quality service.
The going rate for VIP escorts on Eros ranges from $400 to $2,000 per hour, be they women, men or "she-males". A search through the female listings yields an array of escorts who all claim to be well educated and worldly, and appear exceptionally attractive. An escort's fee is determined by the provider or agency; Eros is merely a clearinghouse.
“I only charged $300 when I lived in San Francisco,” Andrea says. Unlike most industries, escorts can charge higher prices when they are in greater supply. This is because price is one of the few metrics sex suppliers can use to convey quality. (In this way it is not unlike the hedge-fund industry.) There are only about 30 VIPs in San Francisco, but nearly 100 in New York, so Andrea can charge more here. The customer demographic is also wealthier, and a higher price deters customers from bargaining, which is considered poor taste.
In any non-competitive industry, setting a price is a supplier's way of communicating value to a customer. When information is imperfect or asymmetrical (ie, when customers don't know enough about a product, or when suppliers are ignorant of their value relative to their competition), prices deviate from their market value and the market becomes riddled with inefficiency. This is why tourists in midtown Manhattan spend too much money on fake antiques, and why my local laundromat will wash and dry my clothing for half the price of rival cleaners across the street.
For a prostitute, the asymmetry is more profound. On the supply side, it is challenging for Andrea to price herself relative to her competition. Despite the publicly available listings of prices, photos and expertise of fellow escorts on Eros, it is impossible to know if these other women provide comparable services. On the demand side customers cannot be certain that the product resembles the advertising. And much of the value is merely hinted at, owing to the illegality of prostitution.
The credit crunch means customers have become more price-sensitive. Andrea now receives more requests for an hour of her time instead of two. One woman on Eros is currently offering "Wall Street adjusted courtesy rates". But given the role price plays in indicating quality, rates will probably remain sticky.
"I could do lots of other jobs, but this what I want to be doing”
Andrea first considered the industry after watching the 1967 film "Belle de jour" with her then husband some years ago. (She is now divorced.) She found herself inspired by Catherine Deneuve's character--a married woman who worked as a prostitute by day--and saw this as a life she might like to lead. Upon exploring her own sexuality, she discovered she had a special gift: “I can be turned on internally," she explains. "I don’t need that hot guy in front of me, it comes from within.”
Employed as a personal assistant, Andrea began looking for more interesting work. She was intrigued by an advertisement on craigslist for “Very personal assistants.” The job, she discovered, entailed a mix of secretarial work and the odd sexual act. For her first time, she let the man set the price: $200. They proceeded to have what Andrea describes as an “amazing” sexual encounter. Afterward she realised that she could ditch the secretarial work and make more money “just doing the fun stuff.”
She tentatively began advertising herself on Eros, and set her fee at $300 an hour. (Friends in the industry recommended the site.) This price was higher than what women charged in the craigslist classifieds (considered the dregs of the industry), yet lower than the going rate on Eros. New to the industry, she felt she was not yet worth a higher rate. She raised her price upon moving to New York last autumn.
In outlining her value, Andrea boasts that she does not merely provide sex, but also a vital service. She prides herself on being in tune with the desires of her clients, and maintains that she enjoys the experience. For her single male customers, she provides needed intimacy. For married ones, she says filling an “emptiness” in their lives can enhance their relationships with their partners.
“I love what I do,” Andrea tells me. “Many of the girls hate it, but I love it. I could do lots of other jobs, but this what I want to be doing.” Andrea concedes that she's still new to the field, but her pleasure seems genuine.
Learning the tricks of the trade
Selecting an escort is tricky, given the limited information, daunting range of prices and questionable legality of the enterprise. There are services to aid consumers, such as the Erotic Review, a popular website that offers thorough reviews of the physical and sexual characteristics of escorts (on a scale of one to ten). The VIP section reads like the Penthouse forum (VIP distinction is quite pervasive in the industry).
Yet this information can also be unreliable. David Elms, the original owner of the Erotic Review, was accused of accepting bribes in exchange for posting positive reviews. Yet even when reviews are posted in good faith, experiences with a single escort may vary according to the circumstances. The variability in dollar value for a single escort’s service is a phenomenon known as YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary).
Favourable reviews let escorts charge higher fees, but also increase the risk of alerting law enforcement officials. This is because the site makes plain what Eros leaves to euphemism ("escort services" can mean many things.) Andrea has taken several measures to evade legal action. Customers must contact her through her website and provide a real name and phone number. The number must be a main line at a verifiable company, not a personal extension. Self-employed clients need a reference from another escort. Neophytes must seek services elsewhere first.
As many as 100 visitors come to her website each day, Andrea proudly discloses. (Activity on the site certainly peaks on Fridays at 1pm.) Her site features many alluring photographs, and she wears some clothing in all of them. Nudity signals low quality.
Andrea learned some tricks of the trade from other women in the industry. Independent providers have a loose sorority, even though they compete with one another. Escorts maintain a website called the National Deadbeat Registry, which features advice such as: “Stay emotionally healthy by being emotionally detached.” Also: “Many clients have issues with women, and therefore do not, or can not, have normal healthy relationships with women. That is why they pay for your time and services. Keep this in mind and remember to not ever get involved, date, or marry your customers.” (So much for nursing "Pretty Woman" fantasies.)
The Deadbeat Registry also names and shames errant hobbyists (men who patronise prostitutes), be they undercover police, insolvent or violent, and highlights those who fail to show up for appointments (a common problem). Andrea tells me about a hobbyist who always paid with a credit card and later disputed the purchase. He did this to several women; once they learned of their shared foe, they banded together and informed their client’s boss of what was being done on company time with a corporate card.
“I consider myself an entrepreneur”
Without the support of an agency, Andrea must manage some tedious aspects of the business, such as operating her own website and covering the costs of advertising, health care, photos for her website and personal grooming.
Working independently is less stable, as agencies tend to provide a more steady stream of clients. But Andrea considers working for an employer degrading, and is uncomfortable with someone else setting a price for her services and profiting off of her body (agencies often take a 50% cut). She prefers choosing her own clients and deciding on what she is willing to do with them. "I am solely responsible for my own mistakes and successes," she says. Having and respecting boundaries is important.
“I’ve always wanted my own business,” she explains. “I consider myself an entrepreneur.”
Agencies often charge higher fees because they claim to offer customers greater accountability. They are seen as more customer friendly and enjoy the advantages of economies of scale, making the costs of screening clients and marketing escorts lower than those for independent providers. Yet Andrea reckons working for an agency has become more dangerous, as law-enforcement officials are more inclined to crack down on larger networks to expose more customers. At any rate, internet listings have enabled more independent providers in recent years
Slouching towards economic equillibrium
In cases of extreme uncertainty on the part of consumers, such as when shopping for a used car, the convention is to expect a “market for lemons”. Used-car salesmen are widely seen as a sleazy bunch owing to incentives they have to lie about a car's quality. Because buyers presume a good chance of fibbing, most will only pay a low price for a used car. This could deter honest brokers, and ensure that only lemons are indeed on the market. Honest salesmen of quality cars can break this cycle and charge more, but only after building a reputation for good value.
Similarly, some assume that the only kind of women who would sell themselves at any price are of poor quality--ie, lemons. Especially valuable escorts who are exceptionally attractive, appealing and skilled, say (ie, in short supply), can break this perception of low value by charging exorbitant prices. (The high prices are also a factor of the illicit nature of the product.) Fees can reach astronomical heights as a supplier builds a reputation. In this way high-end prostitutes can escape the “market for lemons” perception.
Self-employed service providers always struggle to determine what the market will pay for their work. The aspiration is always to find the price that enables economic equillibrium, where supply equals demand. But when the product is sex (human capital in the purest sense) the problem becomes more personal and the information more scarce. The escort industry has developed unique ways to signal value and to overcome information asymmetries. Time and experience should help Andrea to approach her own personal equilibrium price.
Picture credit: KoAn La Scrivana (via Flickr)
(Allison Schrager is an economist based in New York. She keeps a website with links to past articles.)



Delicious
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Comments
There is the setting of
March 14, 2009 - 13:12 — Amanda (not verified)There is the setting of rates to create a certain image. And then there is the setting of rates in order to pay one's bills (which one needs to calculate their bills and income to find the correct rate-range). Though most approach rate structure through a "do what others are doing" approach which does not always serve their own needs well. One size fits all never does.
XX
v interesting.
March 16, 2009 - 04:34 — v interesting. (not verified)v interesting.
Cognitive Dissonance
March 16, 2009 - 23:46 — dbsnip (not verified)...a higher price deters customers from bargaining, which is considered poor taste.
But paying for sex is somehow tasteful?
Andrea considers working for an employer degrading
But whoring is somehow less degrading?
Seriously, this can't be real. I call shenanigans.
Thank you, Ms. Schrager, for
March 17, 2009 - 04:19 — H (not verified)Thank you, Ms. Schrager, for the honest article. It is so refreshing to see articles written on this subject these days that are not riddled with moralism and zealotry.
There is a distinct difference between women who are available to men by the hour and those who have a set minimum of several hours. Those who are available for shorter increments of time must work more often, and the above advice may apply. Encountering many strangers on any level can be daunting; the more intimate and intense the encounter, the more energy expenditure there is. The more often one has to work, the less time in between jobs one has to recover energetically, emotionally, and psychologically.
The services expected are also quite different. The more you charge and the longer your minimum, the less is expected in terms of chamber acrobatics, but more is expected in terms of social finesse, education, presentability, friendliness, warmth, etc.
Because of these differences, someone who demands a gentleman book her for, say, 4 hours minimum, will be more inclined to develop an emotionally intimate relationship with her clients. "Emotionally detached" would never do, and such a companion could not feasibly succeed at longer minimums. The consideration bestowed upon the companion ensures the boundaries between the relationships of "real life" and "paid companionship" are not blurred.
Most of the gentlemen I entertain are fabulously successful and busy, and the only problem they have with women tends to be their inability to have enough time to develop a relationship. Until they slow down enough to nurture a relationship, expedience works for them. They have the money and the constitution to have a "relationship on call."
Longer-term companions also see fewer gentlemen, with longer periods in between to recharge their energies.
Ladies who are available by the hour probably make the most money in the profession, because their market audience is the widest. The gentlemen who see them also value expedience, and more often than not, so do they. They are amazing women who have super-human abilities to make up to several men a day feel special.
For these ladies, the advice quoted above might be useful. These lovelies must take special care to recharge energetically as often as possible. I would also advise Annie Sprinkle's page on this: How to Cure Sex Worker Burnout.
But many ladies I know in the latter category feel no more detached from their patrons than longer-term companions do. The concept of detachment is getting to be a rather old-fashioned one in our profession.
And I have known a couple of successful love-pairings of clients and companions (as well as a couple of failures). I think the failures have more to do with "whore stigma" and overcoming monogamy than naything else.
A New Low in a Publication Already without Scruples toward Women
March 17, 2009 - 13:33 — Marilyn from Chicago (not verified)This is the most revolting story I have ever read on this site. I agree with Cognitive Dissonance that it doesn't sound real. Pretty sure you made the whole thing up. But regardless, this is like trying to set the price of a slave. You've lost me forever as a reader, and I'll be sure to tell all the women I know how retrograde and disrespectful you are in your attitudes toward our gender.
Well, at least her voice is
March 17, 2009 - 14:14 — H (not verified)Well, at least her voice is allowed to be heard. Most of us are silenced.
To dbsnip and Marilyn
March 17, 2009 - 15:44 — Sex Worker (not verified)You two really need to get out more. There are thousands of us. All you have to do is google "high-end escort" and you will come across thousands of sites around the world. There are even male escorts for ladies.
Get over your disgust and live a little. :)
Oliver Wendell Holmes once said, "A mind, stretched to a new experience, can never go back to its old dimensions."
The problem with reducing
March 17, 2009 - 20:38 — m Andrea (not verified)The problem with reducing women to a commodity and then only examining the higher-end product is two-fold.
First, women are reduced to a commodity and men apparently have no problem with this. Can I buy your children? Disagreeable people who moralize unnecessarily might supppose that children cannot consent. But what if I offer them so much candy they agree? That looks like consent to me...
Second, there is always a lower-end product. This lower-end product exists in far greater quantities than the few higher priced versions, and it's shelflife is not so enjoyable. Oftentimes it's journey from a manufacture cuttings health and safety costs to it's cold wet wait on the loading docks contributes to it's early demise.
The average age of female entering prostitution is 13, and she is dead at 27 having spent half her lifetime in and out of jail. To all who would excuse and justify such a world: Scat! Begone to the hell from whence you arrived. Reasonable people do not buy your pack of mentally deficient lies.
Andrea, this article could
March 18, 2009 - 05:52 — H (not verified)Andrea, this article could easily have been written about any number of types of service providers.
When you say "the average age of female entering prostitution is 13", what is your source? Other than several misinformed newspaper articles, or some badly done research?
And what does a 13-year-old have to do with this article? Nobody is excusing a dreadful life such as you describe (nor is anyone saying it doesn't exist).
But being angry with the author of this article is like yelling at People Magazine for writing a story on Brad and Angelina's happy partnership, while many women are abused by their husbands and in some places, they were forced to marry as children. Or yelling at Vogue Magazine because they have a feature article on Roberto Cavalli's atelier, while seamstresses in Viet Nam work under slave-like conditions in a sweat-shop.
World's Oldest profession
March 19, 2009 - 03:36 — CHIRU SUR (not verified)Whoring is not a crime ...using one's sexuality is nothing wrong.The Indians wrote KamaSutra when the rest of the world was in the dark ages.That artful sex needs to be nurtured with a pillow book.
Imagine then how glowing most people on earth would be at all times...so visit us in Calcutta 'The city of Joy' and understand it.
Write to me 'chirus@lycos.com' and start a social anthropolgy project on it.
Escorts are not reduced to
March 26, 2009 - 11:25 — Ingrid Nevin (not verified)Escorts are not reduced to commodities. Nor are they selling themselves.
Their sell their time, skills and ability to understand and engage clients - just like many other professions.
Sex work is work.
So what's new?
April 3, 2009 - 09:58 — Wow Leveling Guide (not verified)Honestly, nothing is new about this. I don't think this is a very decent work, if they call it work.
Recession
April 9, 2009 - 03:53 — MarkM (not verified)I thought that this would be one industry that was recession proof. I guess nothing is immune from this downturn :).
Unlike lawyers.....prostitutes...
April 18, 2009 - 12:02 — Visitor (not verified)Unlike lawyers, prostitutes are free to accelerate their rates and reduce the time allowances to maximize their rates - much more practical for the average guy who needs only 10 minutes.
Place of Prostitution
May 5, 2009 - 11:24 — Muscle Building Exercises (not verified)Some say there's a country that actually has prostitution as an easy way of earning but nevertheless, it is very degrading to those women who are not into prostitution.
Maths
May 10, 2009 - 20:45 — Visitor (not verified)"The average age of female entering prostitution is 13, and she is dead at 27 having spent half her lifetime in and out of jail."
Interesting. Either she has then spent her entire childhood in jail and decided to become a prostitu=te when she got out or, Became a prostitute at 13, got caught and consequently spent the rest of her life in jail.
Hypnosis
May 22, 2009 - 11:32 — Hypnotherapy (not verified)Really, I really do not agree that prostitution is a good business. This is actually exploiting women, some of under age, that's really a bad thing.
Some Facts..
May 22, 2009 - 14:49 — Manuscript Evaluation (not verified)Some Facts
Prostitution is often a women's gateway crime and at least 70% of all women in American prisons were initially arrested for prostitution.
1% of American women have worked as prostitutes.
Of prostitution arrests in the United States, 70% are female prostitutes, 20% are male and 10% are costumers.
Surprisingly, the U.S. Department of Health reports that only 3-5% of STDs are caused by prostitutes, while 30-35% is caused by teenagers. There are very few reports of HIV transmission through prostitutes either.
The United Nations proposed a resolution in favor of the decriminalization of prostitutes in 1949. The resolution has been ratified by 50 countries (excluding the U.S.).
More than 90% of prostitutes suffered sexual abuse as a child (often incest).
Approximately 75% of prostitutes have been violently raped in situations outside of their workplace.
Knighthammer says, "I don?t support prostitution; I just encourage it."
The average length of time that a prostitute in America spends prostituting is 4 years.
2/3 of prostitutes begin working when they are 16 years old or younger.
1.2 million children in the U.S. are involved in child prostitution.
At least 300,000 male prostitutes under the age of 16 exist in the U.S.
"1.2 million children in the
June 4, 2009 - 04:32 — Visitor (not verified)"1.2 million children in the U.S. are involved in child prostitution. "
Well, that's only 1.2 million out of 13 billion Americans.
Seriously, I doubt there are 1.2 million prostitutes in the US, much less 1.2 million child-prostitutes. Or is your definition of involvement living in a city where the PD have a vice squad?
Massage parlors instead of Escorting
June 22, 2009 - 15:02 — Missy (not verified)Interesting article. The naysayers in the comments are probably uninformed. You have several of us working girls saying nice article.
I think the massage parlor is a unique intermediary step. Escorts need to raise their profile to send out those signals. High prices bring celebrities and politicians, for example... wealthier clients. But the wealthier clients are not always more respectful, and almost always have a lot to lose privacy-wise. In my experience they often disrespect women they pay. I blogged for years at eroticmassage.blogs.com for the regular guys I enjoy. I switched to cuntlet.com partly because of the way I was being treated by the higher-end clients. It was no longer "erotic massage", it was submitting to disrespectful and demanding people who considered me more like that moniker than a skilled provider of erotic services.
There is a lot to be said of working with people you like. The Market for Lemons concept shows that it is most difficult to work with people you like - regular guys, who can afford regular rates. There is a lot to be said about working "anonymously" such as we do in massage parlors, and again, your economic theory is very helpful for understanding the market.
Missy
I think you all are lying to yourself
August 18, 2009 - 00:27 — Leslie Katzenmeier husband Dana (you may know him) (not verified)I am the wife of a sucessful and good looking executive. He frequents high priced escorts from time to time against my wishes. I am a woman. We ALL like the power our sexuality holds for our man. Which one of you wants to share your man wityh anyone else. I will say that the fact you want no emotional comittment is a little better for me to know but frankly what I worry about more is my husband bringing home a disease and looking into this work, it seems the "VIP" escorts will give special treatment (high risk sex) to gentleman in the VIP club so to speak. This means as I understand it, no protection, mouth to mouth, genitals to mouth and you know where I am going here.
Since I don't sleep with anyone else but him, I believed I was not at risk. Then he brought home herpes.
This is how I became aware Ihe was a "hobbiest".
I know one thingas a woman, if I had to make my living doing what you do, I would loath the ground my clients walked on and think them pathetic loosers or sex adducts if they were married and wouldn't be man enough to play fair by those rules.
At the very least I would like to know if having sex with him warrented my insisting he wear a condom and stay away from my mouth, genital mouth contact. I don'y believe you can possibly feel anything especially excitement for men who are your clients. I do suppose it must be easier to believe them when they say they are so hugh powered they have no tome to form a meaningful relationship but somehow seem to be able to come to you for several hours each week for the GFE (3= hour) experience. While I am sure sex for a living may seduce one into your work, surely the shine must wear thin rather quickly. I feel bad for you not angry and in a strange way can empathize for your special type of service. There is obviously enough clients to warrent it. It's the thought of the men you must stomache in order to make the money. Before I married, I had a few that made me literally want to vomit. The way they smelled when clean or any little thing ideosyncric to me that repulsed me about them. I am finickey. Even some drop dead, sucessful and gorgeous guys have chemically or psycologically turned me off to the point of repulsion. Don't tell me you are any different? All your married guys already have 2 things against them. They are liers and cheaters.
Double Standards
October 9, 2009 - 14:08 — Ray (not verified)To the poster who associated rape to prostititution, so basically it's a woman's fault if she decides to have her needs met as a woman and be taken care of by a man as well as doing what she will with her own body for getting raped? Sounds no different than the, "Well, it's her fault if she wears a mini skirt," or "It's her fault if she walks out on her own volition at night." Basically it's her fault for being a woman and doing what she will with her own body. When will people stop punishing women for being women and stop imposing arbitrary moral boundaries on our sexuality and on our bodies, much like the double standards that use women's sexuality against us. To reiterate what the old feminist movement stood for: The greatest scourge to a woman is men telling women what to think and how to be." Telling me NOT to be a prostitute and NOT to do what I will with my own body just because it morally offends your hackneyed, oppressive view of what you think a woman should act like is no different than the bible thumpers who tell me that - in *my* best interest, I should be "pro-life"
Crazy Double Standards
October 9, 2009 - 14:13 — Ray (not verified)So it's much more moral for a woman to be a slut and give it away for free rather than a woman deciding to charge of her own volition. Now that's what I call, "crazy!"
....And telling a woman what
October 9, 2009 - 14:24 — Ray (not verified)....And telling a woman what to do with her own body based on YOUR misogynist moral principles is somehow less degrading.
I think the problem here is less on the morality of escorting and more on women's rights. We don't have rights as women as long as men and anybody else for that matter is dictating to us what is moral and what is not moral. As long as we stay imprisoned in that moral paradigm which seeks to enslave our sexuality, we will never be free. See the contradiction in someone telling you that they're dictating to you what your moral boundaries is "liberating?" This is about men controlling OUR nature and using arbitrary moral boundaries to justify rape, sexual violence and other truly degrading acts based on instances of so called "improprities" on the part of men who tell us what is socially moral acceptable behavior for women and what is not socially acceptable moral behavior for us and that, the minute we step out of that paradigm, rather it be slut, whore, prostitute or whatever, we are deserving of rape and harm all because we live in a sexually suppressed, male patriarchial society which fails to see a woman's worth and her right to do what she will with her own body.
This fight is not about just mere prostitution, but the fact that we live in a crazy, male dominated society which seeks to control women and our bodies for their own pleasure, especially if thy can get it "for free". Just look at the bunghat up here who states that a woman is more moral - a "moral oxymoron" - for giving it away for free while telling you what he thinks is good for you - noticeably void of input from us - while wanting what is GOOD FOR HIM "ie free sex"
Your right!
October 9, 2009 - 14:49 — Ray (not verified)Your right! I believe they pulled those statistics right out from their gludius maximus.
People, you have to put things in logical perspective. There IS a difference, between forced prostitution and prostitution. How are you helping the forced ones by forcing ME to live according to YOUR moral beliefs. Should we shut down factories because they - and this is more prevalent than in the prostitution industry - have alot of trafficked people working in them? Let's look at Martha Stuart's line. If you abide by the principle that anytime there is forced labor in an industry, that the whole industry should be shut down, then we might as well shut down sweatshops which makes the majority of our clothes and farms, which are full of migrants FORCED into labor. Should we shut those down too? I mean, how is telling a woman what to do with her own body a pull for human rights? Every industry has bad people. Should we shut down police departments because of bad people? No. Should we shut down factories and farms and sweatshops for employing THE MAJORITY of trafficked people? Hell no! But why criminalize women for doing what they will with their own bodies by not making a COMMON SENSE distinction between FORCED and VOLUNTARY prostitution. That to me against against what the feminist movement stood for, which is that men should not be allowed to think for us so as to protect us from us. Alot of the opponents of prostitution are passively man hating women who pass themselves off a feminist but are really conservative wolves in feminist clothing since all they stand for defies the feminist movement and the man who are against it are nothing more than a bunch of misogynist who *secretly* hate and don't respect women and feel entitled to a woman's body since they feel that they shouldn't have to pay OR get consent even if left up to them! I mean. what is the most hateful and oppressive thing that patriarchal society has imposed on women which is not only using arbitrary moral boundaries to get what they want from women, which is our bodies *for free* just as the person above illustrated by saying that a slut is okay but a whore - a woman who has consciously asked for money for her own body is not since it obviously works against his best interest to get the booty from her - is not okay, but that we can't think for ourselves.
NOW here is the real deal on human trafficking for sex: BECAUSE of anti-prostitution laws - (and the belief in preserving a woman's dignity by protecting her from herself) the children who end up prostituted are the ones who get the blame as well as prosecuted for practicing an "indecent" profession and, because of the moral outrage brought AGAINST them, they are deported and when they go back home, they return to villages and places where the disdain for being a woman and the stigma of being a prostitute is used by that community to shun them and punish them. I neglected to mention that many cops and people of public note also engage in sex with these minors, hence why they don't get prosecuted and the perps often walk of scot free. As a matter of fact, there was a tape that surfaced on the internet showing an FBI agent having sex, hell, RAPING a young girl!
Now how is l
Funny thing is....
October 9, 2009 - 14:51 — Ray (not verified)Some feminists sound like the Catholic Church...upholding papal values by telling women how to think and act based on moral, rigid patriarchal standards.
Addendum
October 9, 2009 - 15:42 — Ray (not verified)As an addendum, I forgot to mention that the illegalization of prostitution is what hurts the victims of human trafficking since making it illegal has reduced the kids to criminals, thus, they run from the police. Second, alot of them are here illegally, and many of the patrons tend to be cops, so who are they gonna run too... third, whe they get caught, since the justice system, cops, etc are all in on it, since the cops - due to the illegality of prostitution, not it's nature - have a vested interest of USING PROSTITUTION LAWS to prosecute the kids and keep their mouths shut. Most often, the kids end up being deported and when they are forced to go back home, not only do they have to live with the memory of the horros they went through, but they have to face the social stigma of being put down FOR BEING A PROSTITUTE. wheter forced or not in societites that believe in punishing women for their sexuality as well as just being women. Talk about cycle of violence.
Don't end prostitution, criminalize the double standards and moral beliefs that offsets anti-woman, misogynist bigoted violence and justifies control of a woman's body by telling us what is okay for us and how we should behave.
This fight is not about just
January 14, 2010 - 15:06 — Psychology degree (not verified)This fight is not about just mere prostitution, but the fact that we live in a crazy, male dominated society which seeks to control women and our bodies for their own pleasure, especially if thy can get it "for free".
Post new comment