MAKING OPERA FRESH

zuber_carmen_b.jpg

As the Metropolitan Opera celebrates its 125th anniversary, the company is working to appeal to contemporary audiences. Opera productions “are like shells that have to be shed,” explains Peter Gelb, the general manager ...

From ECONOMIST.COM

For the past few months, people who attended a concert at Lincoln Centre have had to meander through a sprawling construction site. The windswept plazas and some of the hulking grey 1960s buildings have been renovated. Even the main plaza’s famous fountain is receiving a high-tech makeover. Alice Tully Hall recently re-opened, with an airy new foyer and russet-hued auditorium.

Other changes at Lincoln Centre are less obvious but equally dramatic. New York City Opera (which is distinct from—scrappier, poorer and more innovative in its programming choices than—the Metropolitan Opera company) made headlines in 2007 by hiring Gerard Mortier as general manager; 18 months later he left, complaining the company’s budget was too small for his ambitions. He was replaced by George Steel, a young conductor whose only experience running an opera company was three months presiding over the Dallas Opera.

The giant Metropolitan Opera house, which looms over the back of the central plaza, is not being renovated. But since Peter Gelb became general manager in 2006 the organisation has certainly been modernised, with simulcasts of popular operas and film and theatre directors recruited to stage new productions.

I visit Mr Gelb to discuss his plans for the Met’s 125th anniversary gala. In his spacious office, tucked behind the cavernous theatre, he tells me that he wanted to create something that “would fly in the face of the traditional hackneyed gala”, where singers dutifully shuttle on and off stage with conveyor-belt monotony.

Mr Gelb decided that it would be more exciting to recreate scenes from historic Met productions. He was inspired in part by a photo that hangs in a Met conference room, showing Enrico Caruso standing on a tree stump with a noose around his neck before his big aria in the last act of Puccini’s “La Fanciulla Del West.”

Mr Gelb explains that one of his goals at the Met is to use modern theatrical techniques to make opera appealing to contemporary audiences. Opera productions “are like shells that have to be shed,” he says. “We have to do new things.”

Like most arts institutions, the Met has been thwacked by the economic crisis; it has lost one-third of its $300m endowment. Management has recently cut pay for singers and senior staff and axed several ambitious productions scheduled for next season. The famous Chagall murals that hang in the Met’s enormous windows and provide a picturesque backdrop for the main Lincoln Center plaza will be used as collateral for a long-term loan.

But this gala was planned before the economic turmoil, Mr Gelb notes, and much of the money was already committed. It caps a fundraising drive, and donors expect a showstopper.

The costumes, which are being made in a shop outside the Met, are expensive. Much of the scenery, however, is being recreated with projections and thus is relatively cheap. It’s all “smoke and mirrors,” laughs Mr. Gelb.

We chat about the problem of keeping the art form fresh, particularly when so many die-hard opera buffs are wedded to the past—obsessed with long-dead divas and averse to contemporary productions and composers.

“It’s great to have a sense of the past,” says Mr Gelb, “but we have to live in the present. My concern is to keep this art form moving forward, which is why I’m so interested in bringing in new directors.” If you’re a baseball fan, he adds, “you can sit and think about Babe Ruth all day long, but it’s more fun to experience what’s happening now.”

Picture credit: Met Opera Archives, Ken Howard/Metropolitan Opera

(This is a correspondent's diary published on Economist.com.)


FINE & PERFORMING ARTS  new york  

Comments

Art has to stay contemporary


It's a great relief that there are individuals (like Mr Gelb) that have realized that the creative arts depend on both popularity AND remaining current. Popularity is a necessity for the art to survive, but art also must be seen as a reflection on society.
This is why modern composers of opera should be encouraged and applauded by those that consider themselves "connoisseurs". It's odd that the same individuals that scoff at the droves that go to see Carmen or Don Giovanni also turn their nose up at minimalism and serialism.
The final paragraph's quote of Mr. Gelb reaffirms this notion. The brilliant operas of Verdi, Wagner, and Puccini should continue to be performed - but it's hardly an accurate reflection of modern opera. Those that commit themselves to opera should realize that Schoenberg and Glass, not Bizet, hold the key to the future of opera.

Mahratta I have been


Mahratta

I have been thinking about this a great deal. The problem seems to be that so much great opera (literature, art, you name it) has been produced in the past that it is becoming very difficult to say something genuinely new that matches in quality the works of the past. And if it does not, then the consumers of the particular art form might very well ask: why bother with the new? (After all there is only so much time in a day; we do have to "economize"). Perhaps there really is such a thing as end of art? Hesse in fact proposes that in time we will realize that everything that can be said has been said already and will limit our cultural pursuits to juggling our past achievements.

maybe not the end of art


or, maybe it's not that art has come to an end, but that in any current production there is bound to be more dross than diamonds; overtime the dross falls by the wayside leaving only the diamonds and making the past look better; so that, seen from the future, the past is bound to look better than the present; but we have accumulated such an amount of diamonds of the past that modern consumer is faced with the choice of a great variety of tried and true classics on the one hand or the uncertainty of a new work and, on odds alone, prefers the tried and true?

It's definitely a concept


It's definitely a concept worth a thought - but not one I personally subscribe to.

It's a sentiment that I'm sure was shared by philosophers in the 19th century, reminiscing on the artistic glories of the Baroque and Classical periods - however, the composers of the 19th century proved through their work that art was indeed still as vibrant as ever.

To me, the factor that has caused a stagnation (in comparison to centuries past) of artistic creativity is found in the stigmatization of music.
The concrete separation of "classical" or "art" music from "popular" music is a factor that really stifles the process of composition. The "classical" music community is tiny in proportion to the "popular" music community, and, in addition, the proportion of these "classical" listeners who actively participate in receiving new compositions is, at best, a small fraction of what it was 100 years ago. With the somewhat symbiotic relation that the composer holds with the audience now so fragile, the composer's task becomes rather more difficult.

Your diamond analogy is particularly interesting. It's a brilliant comparison - to me, this is a defining point of "classical" or "art" music. Will the consumer find that their ideal new work is in "popular" music, which makes rather slower advances and utilizes more approachable musical concepts? If so, this could spell the doom of the evolution of "classical" music - many so-called aficionados, as I pointed out earlier, will turn their noses up at experimental music - a necessary step in determining the natural path for music to follow. Who then will support the development of "classical" music?

Art can be seen as a reflection of a society. Perhaps it will take a few years to realize the genius of the compositions of our age.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.