I'M TIRED OF BANKSY

For years we’ve debated the identity of Banksy, a notoriously anonymous British graffiti artist. But Gary Moskowitz is tired of fetishising the man's incongruities (if Banksy is a man) ...
Special to MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE
Whenever I catch a bus from my London flat heading down Essex Road to the Angel tube, I ride past a big stencilled image on the side of a wall. It is of three children standing at the base of a flagpole, two holding their hands over their hearts and the third hoisting a flag that says "Tesco", a British supermarket chain. It’s a Banksy piece called “Very Little Helps”, and I glance at it every time I go by.
The piece is funny, even political. Whomever Banksy is and whatever the public thinks of his work, this particular use of about ten feet of public space is fine by me.
But the Banksy buzz is getting old. For years, we’ve debated the identity of this British graffiti artist, whose work began appearing on Bristol streets in 1993 and now sells for record prices. (Though his auction prices have fallen between 30-50% in the recession.) Is he a talented prankster from Bristol? A subversive art collective? A dinner guest at Joan Collins’s house? A man named Robin Gunningham? Did he just paint his own self-portrait? And what do his spray-painted stencils really mean, anyway? Do we give him too much credit? Not enough? These riddles have long been fascinating, largely for their Rorschach-worthiness: Banksy's anonymity has allowed us to turn him into what we want him to be.
The Banksy show now on at the Andipa Gallery in posh Chelsea, until May 16th, rekindles the conversation. Acoris Andipa, director of the tiny gallery, has gathered his personal collection of 35 Banksy originals (some signed) together with several more common prints. Andipa told me he’s paid up to six figures for Bansky works, which he describes as “brilliant” with a “poignant social narrative.”
The show includes familiar pieces such as “Love is in the Air (Flower Thrower)”, in which a man dressed like a street terrorist throws a bouquet as if it was a grenade (pictured, top). And there are a few gems, such as “Lenin on Rollerblades” (pictured, right), stencilled on six two-by-fours; “Horse on Steel”, a spray-painted stencil of a praying horse; and “Untitled (Policeman and Spliff)”, which depicts a police officer lighting up with a young girl, stencilled onto a piece of brown grocery-bag paper. This last piece sold for £120,000 ($183,000) the day of my visit.
But all of this has driven it home: I’m bored of Banksy. Sure, I enjoy stumbling across his work in alleys and splashed on buildings throughout London. And occasionally the artist has created work both bracingly timely and incisive (”NOLA", is a particularly good example). But it is impossible to contain the raw energy of street art in a formal art space, where any anti-establishment strains in his work are bled away beneath the expensive track lighting.
In the New Yorker in 2007 Lauren Collins considered the incongruities of Banksy's persona, which the artist clearly revels in:
“The art world is the biggest joke going,” he has said. “It’s a rest home for the overprivileged, the pretentious, and the weak.” Although he once declared that “every other type of art compared to graffiti is a step down,” in recent years he has produced his share of traditional works on canvas and on paper, suitable for hanging indoors, above a couch ... Ralph Taylor, a specialist in the Sotheby’s contemporary-art department, said of Banksy, “He is the quickest-growing artist anyone has ever seen of all time.” Banksy responded to the Sotheby’s sale by posting a painting on his Web site. It featured an auctioneer presiding over a crowd of rapt bidders, with the caption “I can’t believe you morons actually buy this shit.”
It's hard not to be both irked and impressed. It takes real cleverness to have it both ways. But this juggling act seems to have exhausted itself. In late April, when anti-graffiti volunteers in Glastonbury accidentally painted over a Banksy original--an image of Paddington Bear with the caption "Migration is not a crime", worth £5,000--there were almost too many punchlines to know when to laugh (a very post-modern problem). (The town council has agreed to remove the layer of paint and have conservators look at it.)
I'm ready to move on. On my way home from the Chelsea show, I saw that someone had spray-painted the words “Bad News” on the side of an Evening Standard newspaper bin, where a stack of newspapers spilled out onto the sidewalk. Just underneath this graffiti someone else wrote “Bears” in green ink. Evoking "Bad News Bears", a ridiculous Walter Mathau film from 1976, did not make for a polished piece of street art, but I found the scrawled commentary refreshing: it was funny, timely, improvised and real.
Banksy from the Collection of Andipa Gallery, London, until May 16th
Picture credit: “Love is in the Air (Flower Thrower)”, “Lenin on Rollerblades”
(Gary Moskowitz is a journalist and a musician based in London. He last wrote about "The Beauty Academy of Kabul".)



Delicious
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Comments
Maybe its art?
May 11, 2009 - 19:57 — Mr. Hodgkins (not verified)Maybe its not 'street art' anymore. Maybe its just 'art'. Maybe he's crossed genres. Maybe he is having it both ways ala Andy Warhol, who had other people create the art for him and continued to be anti-establishment even as people were paying countless thousands for his work. Are you sick of Banksy's art? His messages? Or are you sick of his Public Relations?
Hate the man. Respect the art.
banksy
May 12, 2009 - 04:08 — g moskowitz (not verified)thanks for the comment. andy warhol is a great example to bring up (Basquiat might be another one, or Shepard Fairey). Not so much sick of Banksy's art (2 armored tanks having sex is still funny), just the hype
Graffitti, what is it good for?
May 12, 2009 - 04:19 — Visitor (not verified)Absolutely nothin...say it again.
Just Bored
May 12, 2009 - 10:30 — Art (not verified)I second that--the method, the message, all of it has stopped being as interesting as it once was
Surely any idiot (even an
May 13, 2009 - 04:27 — Visitor (not verified)Surely any idiot (even an 'art collector') can see that Lenin on Rollerblades and Horse on Steel haven't been made by the same person as NOLA and Love is in the Air...Lenin on Rollerbaldes could have been Banksy 10 years ago, but it's so roughly done that I can't believe that it's the same man now, and Horse on Steel is a million miles away from Banksy stuff!
here's one for the debate:
May 14, 2009 - 07:08 — g moskowitz (not verified)here's one for the debate:
interesting story here on Andy Warhol and celebrity-ness of artists: http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2009/may/13/war...
Horrible, awful "irony art"
May 16, 2009 - 19:22 — Visitor (not verified)Horrible, awful "irony art"
Puff piece
May 17, 2009 - 03:35 — Visitor (not verified)Iconoclastic, maybe. But not well researched. Two minutes on Google would have given you his name and bio.
thanks for the feedback,
May 17, 2009 - 13:31 — g moskowitz (not verified)thanks for the feedback, "Puff Piece." How great that we live in a time that quick Google searches can answer all of the world's cultural and sociological questions. Love it.
about time even his
June 27, 2009 - 12:06 — Visitor (not verified)about time even his "intelligent" graffiti suffers the fate of all other graffit - it gets bombed
Graffiti
July 16, 2009 - 10:50 — Drug Rehab (not verified)I disagree with the post with the subject "Graffitti, what is it good for?". It's art and serves as a from expression. Heck, it can be a form of revolution.
is graffiti art dead?
December 27, 2009 - 22:14 — Visitor (not verified)repetitive and noisy, obsolete and just about everywhere in the urban landscape.
it is spelling out it´s own death.
history.
Post new comment