OUR GUIDE TO THE BEST CRITICS: FILM

BLUNT CANDOUR AND DONNISH INTELLECT | March 10th 2008

[Image]
mutednarayan/Flickr

In our second instalment of "Reviewers revered", Julie Kavanagh, Jasper Rees and others name their favourite film critics. Anthony Lane earns the most plaudits, even among those who rarely go to the cinema. (Read our introduction to the series here, and our selection of favourite book critics here) ...

From INTELLIGENT LIFE magazine, Spring 2008

In our list below, the name at the top is the nominee, and the nominator is listed as a sign-off. For more about our contributors, see our introduction.

*****

ANTHONY LANE

(The New Yorker, every other Monday)

Lane, who is English, vaulted to the New Yorker from the Independent on Sunday in 1993: the critic as unimpeachable stylist. His sentences are lovely, delivering their goods with an uncrotchety humour that seems to fall in with the pace of your own best thinking and feeling. He's a very flattering writer. ~ NICK COLEMAN

Before seeing a movie I always check the New Yorker site to find out if Anthony Lane has reviewed it. A young Brit with a donnish intellect, the wit of Clive James and a voice entirely his own, he has a big following in America, but is known only to devotees back home. I often return to his collection "Nobody's Perfect" (Picador, 2002) for a rush of inspiration. ~ JULIE KAVANAGH

He is so entertaining and informed that I read him religiously, even though I hardly go to the cinema. ~ TOM STANDAGE

It used to be Adam Mars-Jones, but today it is Anthony Lane whose film reviews put into words what I wish I'd said myself but never could. He asks the questions the directors should have asked themselves, in a deft, clean process that is both funny and incredibly clever.
~ REBECCA WILLIS

The Rolls-Royce of film critics. Never mind the film, you read Lane for the sheer quality of the prose. ~ MICK BROWN

The least gushing, most incisive and funniest film critic. ~ SIMON GARFIELD

 

DAVID EDELSTEIN

(New York magazine, every Monday)

David Edelstein's reviews have the winning gruffness of someone thinking aloud. He's not trying to persuade you of anything, merely filing a report from the front row, with all the blunt candour of someone riding out his own unruly reactions. He levels with you, he doesn't try to impress, and says more things you want to steal than any other critic. I treasure his observation about how dangerous it is for a character in a biopic to develop a cough. ~ TOM SHONE

David Edelstein's artfully plain-spoken reviews--also found at Slate.com, where he was until 2005--bristle with a love of film and unfold with casual confidence. He will boldly praise goofy blockbusters and convincingly topple false idols (on "Atonement": "It doesn't fuck with your head"). Back when I was an intern, I sent him a piece of fan-mail, sand-bagged with reviews of my own. He responded immediately and reassured me that he, too, began his career spending "48 hours writing a 400-word review". "My advice is simple", he wrote: "Write." ~ EMILY BOBROW

 

PHILIP FRENCH

(The Observer, every Sunday)

Good critics provide an historical context without losing their enthusiasm for innovation. I've always enjoyed Philip French's reviews for that reason: if there's a parallel between the new Tarantino and a little-known Italian thriller of the 1930s, French can be relied on to spot it and to explain what it means. ~ BLAKE MORRISON

 

RYAN GILBEY

(The New Statesman, every Thursday)

For his exact dissections of why a film matters, and his uninsistent familiarity with cinema's backwaters. More than capable of turning an entertaining phrase, but never at the expense of the film, only in its service. Also quite brilliant at reporting without spoiling the ending. ~ ISABEL LLOYD

 

ANTHONY QUINN

(The Independent, every Friday)

The stand-out stylist among Fleet Street film critics, Quinn has an impeccable nose for quality in an art form which, more than any other, requires reviewers to sift through chaff. ok, so he's seldom wild about low-budget British fare, gross-out comedy or punishing releases from Kazakhstan, but you can put your faith in his lapidary judgments on the great American film-makers. ~ JASPER REES

film  

Comments

Anthony Lane then Nigel


Anthony Lane then Nigel Andrews. Lane's a better writer, Andrews has (marginally) superior taste. Others mentioned here are way behind.

armand white?


armand white?

And on the radio


Mark Kermode. On FiveLive in the UK. Strong opinions and eclectic taste, but always worth listening too.

Filthy critic?


You've missed one. Sure, he's gratuitously vulgar and has a bad case of rock'n'roll attitude, but beyond the facade is a mind as sharp as any of the top critics: http://www.bigempire.com/filthy/

David Thomsen


No list of best film critics should exclude David Thomsen.

Where are the blog reviewers


There are thousands of excellent film critics in the blogosphere from all over the world. It's frustrating to see the continued hegemony of critics from the print world (online versions of print publications just a new package for the same group of elites).

Blog reviewers


We've included Jessa Crispin in our round-up of book critics; who would you like to anoint as a top film blogger? Are there really thousands of excellent ones? Feel free to name them.

Morgenstern


Morgenstern from the WSJ (most Fridays) is pretty good.

A.O. SCOTT!


He should be at the top of this list, right?

OK, here are a few


Thousands may be an exaggeration, but there are many, many great critics out there. Kimberly Lindbergs of Cinebeat (http://www.cinebeats.com/) makes all things 60s and 70s come alive. Peter Nellhaus of Coffee, Coffee, and More Coffee (http://www.coffeecoffeeandmorecoffee.com/) is witty and wise. Campespe at Self-Styled Siren (http://selfstyledsiren.blogspot.com/) does classic movies like no one else. Dennis Cozzalio at Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule (http://sergioleoneifr.blogspot.com/) is just simply great no matter what he writes about. The collective of film writers that is Cinematical (http://www.cinematical.com/) is like having an all-star team, all devoted to film. Michael Guillen at The Evening Class (http://theeveningclass.blogspot.com/) has a ton of insights and great taste. I could go on, but click on some of their links and you'll find lots more.

J. Hoberman


That would be my addition to the list. Village Voice critic since the late Carter years. Vulgar Modernism is one of the sharpest books on cinema ever written.

Indeed


Yes, he is surely the best thing still going at the Voice. (He wants films to succeed - he laments in their failure, rather than relishing shortcomings. The real thing.) A pity we didn't include him in the first round. Thanks for adding him to the list.

stephanie zacharek


Stephanie Zacharek, at Salon.com, is among my favorite film critics.

Armond White


Not Armond White! Every review is the same. He uses movies as an excuse to talk about his uninteresting moral beliefs.

Geoff Andrew


Surely Geoff Andrew (Time Out, BFI) deserves a mention.

Peter Bradshaw


I can't believe no-one has mentioned Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian. Droll and passionate in equal measure. I also salute the sub-editor who came up with the headline "Peter Bradshaw not smash Hulk. Kind to Hulk."

OUR GUIDE TO THE BEST CRITICS: FILM


No Stanley Kauffmann? Shame on you.

list


+1 Completely agree, I also thought of excluding David Thomsen

+1 for Mark Kermode


+1 for Mark Kermode. I like his style and his ability to unleash the topic to its logical end.

“Revenge of the Sith”


The general opinion of “Revenge of the Sith” seems to be that it marks a distinct improvement on the last two episodes, “The Phantom Menace” and “Attack of the Clones.

thomsOn


cheers.

critics


gene shalit

A. Quinn is my favorite! My


A. Quinn is my favorite! My vote goes to him.

The general opinion of


The general opinion of “Revenge of the Sith” seems to be that it marks a distinct improvement on the last two episodes, “The Phantom Menace” and “Attack of the Clones.

Hector Soto


My vote is for Hector Soto. http://blog.latercera.com/blog/hsoto/

There are thousands of


There are thousands of excellent film critics in the blogosphere from all over the world. It's frustrating to see the continued hegemony of critics from the print world

Ella Taylor


Recently fired from Village Voice Media (and L.A. Weekly), London-born. Great writer (academic background), good taste (often agrees with me, natch!), never follows the crowd. My favorite critic in U.S. (until April 1 when she disappeared). I hope somebody has the sense to give her a job soon!

Good list. My vote is for


Good list. My vote is for Eric M. Armstrong of The Moving Arts Film Journal http://themovingarts.com He's very funny, and has an encyclopedic knowledge of cinema. He's very consistent so I always check his reviews before I see a film and he's usually spot on. Also, I believe he's only like 23 years old--impressive for a young fellow.

I'd have to give it up for


I'd have to give it up for Clydefro Jones at filmjournal.net/clydefro. He offers incite, knowledge and is extremely impressive. However, he seldom writes about current films. If you haven't read his blog, check it out.

Thanks veru good


Thanks veru good information..

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options