Subscribe to Intelligent Life

RECENT ARTICLES


LITERATURE
Writing workshops
Herodotus and the oracle
"Things Fall Apart"
Book critics we like
Memoirs of a nobody
Thomas Bernhard
Herodotus and bad fate
Norman Rush's "Mortals"
Herodotus and retrospection
Grace Paley's "Fidelity"
Herodotus and women
Norman Mailer
Reading Herodotus
The indexing trade
The memoir boom
Barnes & Noble Media

MUSIC
Orchestral pleasures in Abu Dhabi
Sparks perform everything
Rock critics we like
Letting Bach breathe (audio)
Bryce Morrison on Hattogate
Music as installation art
The Joyce Hatto affair
The autumn IL playlist

FINE & PERFORMING ARTS
Niall Hobhouse's collection
Louise Bourgeois chills
Larry Gagosian
Two Gauguins
New York's Armory Show
Two-headed bust at Bonham's
"Design and the Elastic Mind"
American art in Dulwich
Natalia Goncharova
Tony Harrison's "Fram"
Design: Alexander von Vegesack
Circular tables at Christie's
Dani Karavan
Making a musical
Edward Weston's photographs
Richard Dadd at Bonhams
Hillary Carlip's "A la Cart"

FILM
Tribeca Film Festival
Watching "Shine A Light"
Martin Sheen for president
Smoking on screen
Film critics we like
East Germany on screen
I love the Oscars
Scott Burns
British Council film festival
"The Man from Earth"
David Lynch
"Yiddish Theatre, a Love Story"
"La Chinoise"
"Helvetica"

FOOD & DRINK
The mission: soufflé
Australia's wine country
Well-tempered chocolatiers
Sipping Cos D'Estournel
It's offal good
Tasting Graves wines
Chateau Les Crayeres
Where the cabbies eat
Reading about wine
Wine and me
Taillevent
La Mission Haut-Brion
Perfect cup of tea
Live food
Le Cinq at George V

ISSUES & IDEAS
Decision making
A sceptic's pilgrimage
The BBC's decline
Freedom from the Olympics
High-end prostitution
The Diana Inquest
Sarkozy visits England
TEOTWAWKI
Beggars can be orators
Aldermaston march
Friend of a farmer
Commander-in-chief
"The New Cold War"
Epicurus exonerated
Lazy language, lazy thought
Cuba and the TRNC
Britain's silly tax laws

PHILANTHROPY
Robin Hood and the ARK
Your money or your life?
Donating to Afghanistan
One cause, or many?
Embedded giving
Giving for scholarship
Helping a beggar
Children and wealth
New Philanthropy Capital

PLACES
Jaffa's vanished glory
Gardens of eden
Walking all over the world
Mexican notes
McCain in Maryland
A Mali holiday
Living in Babel
Down in the Delta
My house in Marrakech
What do people do in Antarctica?
Falling in love with DC
Eat in Peckham
Chicago sells well
Fun times in Maputo
Breaking into Burma
Dresden's rebirth
Birth bribes in Budapest
New York's cemeteries

SPORT
Olympic memorabilia
Watch cricket
Marathon training
Remembering Munich
Against the London Olympics
American exceptionalism
Rugby World Cup 2007 (ii)
Rugby World Cup 2007 (i)

TECHNOLOGY
Robots get cuddly
Redesigning the dinosaur
Interactive clothing
David Weinberger
Ned Kahn
Swarming robots

MISCELLANY
TV, theatre, pop culture critics
Are you being followed?
The spring issue is here
Sex diaries of Keynes
New York cabs
Benjamin Franklin
Hitler's digestion
Life as a handbag
Stroke me, I'm a primate
The death of alpha-blogging
Swearing and Steven Pinker
Castration and sex

THE SEX DIARIES OF JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES

A KEY FOR THE PRURIENT | January 28th 2008

Leo Reynolds/Flickr

Evan Zimroth has been researching the life of J.M. Keynes and deciphering the great man's sex diaries. One is easy (a lot of Duncan Grant). The other uses a code which, if nothing else, helps break the ice at parties ...

Special to MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE

Last week at a drinks event at the Oxford and Cambridge Club on Pall Mall, I had the good fortune to chat about Israel with an eminent professor of ecclesiastical history. His family had always been pro-Israel, he assured me, but now, sadly...things are different. So we had the usual dust-up. Champagne in hand, I jumped in headlong and called him an anti-Semite and he (ditto) countered with the speech that begins "You Americans always ..."

After the skirmish, though, it turned out that we share a sceptical view of Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, me for the good Archbishop's positions on Israel and my ecclesiastical friend for Williams' support of the Church's official position on homosexuality. "Rowan," he said with evident familiarity, or maybe irony, "doesn't care for my partner." Aha. "I'd like to ask you something about John Maynard Keynes," I said. "Keynes kept these sex diaries ..."

A little more champagne and we were talking about cock-sucking.

Keynes was never a closeted homosexual, although his colleagues at Bretton Woods in 1945 didn't always realise it, perhaps because at those conferences he was accompanied by the Russian ballerina Lydia Lopokova, his wife of twenty years. By then he was the eminent economist and statesman, and possibly no longer on the prowl.

In earlier days, though, from 1901 to 1915 when he was mostly a 20-something, he cruised constantly and kept two sex diaries of his success. Luckily Keynes was a pack-rat, so we have both of these documents, among a mass of J.M. Keynes memorabilia housed in the modern archives at King's College, Cambridge, (They are reproduced in "Maynard Keynes: An Economist's Biography", by D. E. Moggridge, albeit in an appendix labelled "A Key for the Prurient.")

Keynes obsessively counted and tabulated almost everything; it was a life-long habit. As a child, he counted the number of front steps of every house on his street. Later he kept a running record (not surprisingly) of his expenses and his golf scores. He also counted and tabulated his sex life.

The first diary is easy: Keynes lists his sexual partners, either by their initials (GLS for Lytton Strachey, DG for Duncan Grant) or their nicknames ("Tressider," for J. T. Sheppard, the King's College Provost). When he apparently had a quick, anonymous hook-up, he listed that sex partner generically: "16-year-old under Etna" and "Lift boy of Vauxhall" in 1911, for instance, and "Jew boy," in 1912.

This list, where he names names but gives no details, Keynes organised year-by-year. He was scrupulously honest, too, even in times of sexual famine. For three years running—1903 to 1905—he records no sexual partners; ‘nil,' he admitted. As he became older, though, the number of his partners increased dramatically, so that for 1911 he lists eight partners (although half of these are probably one-time pick-ups), for 1915 he lists seven, and for 1913 (his highest score) he lists nine different partners. One or two men are repeaters: DG (Duncan Grant), for example, runs throughout.

The other sex diary is more puzzling and, in a way, more informative. An economist to the core, Keynes organized the second sex diary also year-by-year, but this time in quarterly increments.

Unfortunately for us, however, this second sex diary is in code. And as far as I know, no one yet has been prurient enough to crack it.

Here's what Keynes' tabulation looks like. For every quarter-year from 1906 to 1915, he tallies up his sexual activities and totals them under three categories: C, A, and W.

For each of these headings, he records the number of times each activity occurred, and also when. For example, between May and August, 1911, he performed (if that's the right word) C 16 times, A four times, and W five times.

Whenever I have had the chance—as with the Church historian—I have asked people to free associate to Keynes' code. When presented with "A" they invariable said "ass", which is almost undoubtedly right, but it leaves open the question of who/whom. Is it giving or receiving? The legal term for anal intercourse (vaguely defined) is per anum, and in Keynes' day it could get you thrown in jail with hard labour, as happened to Oscar Wilde in 1895 when, to his surprise and eventual devastation, he was put away for two years. So Keynes, understandably, is taking care in this diary to hide his activity.

dukepowers/Flickr

As for "W", everyone says right away, "wanking," or masturbating. The problem with this decoding is that one would expect the numbers for W to be the highest (how sexually active could Keynes possibly have been?), but in fact the totals for W are the lowest for the three categories. Surprisingly, for several quarters, W happened zero times. So either Keynes didn't bother to masturbate, or he didn't need to because his other numbers are so high.

The tricky one is C. What springs to mind (well, to my mind) is "copulation," or "cop" as Keynes would have said, but copulation is a very vague term (again, who/whom, and exactly how does this work?).

In 1920s London the word did not necessarily always mean sexual intercourse of any variety (as we use it today) but could suggest only a kiss on the cheek (I beg your pardon, not that cheek) or a quick squeeze. In fact any flirtation beyond mere suggestive banter could come under the heading of "cop."

My Church historian pal instantly suggested "cock-sucking," but while an appealing idea, I think it's rather less likely than the more generalised (and flirtatious) "cop." For one thing, according to Keynes' tabulation, what he did most frequently and consistently was C. It happened 17 times from May to August of 1908, 28 times (!) from August to November that year, 20 times from February to May of 1909, and so on. That's a lot of C. The high numbers for C loosely (but not consistently) correlate to university holidays, the break at Easter and the longer summer holiday, when Keynes would have had more leisure to pursue and enjoy his bouts of C.

C therefore could be a general act—"cop"—a sweet time, maybe a kiss, maybe a little more, with a hoped-for return on investment. C could also stand for "cruising." Or even "cottaging," looking for sex in a public bathroom. Lest you think that "cruising" and "cottaging" are merely recent terms, may I suggest you brush up on your Polari?

Polari, or "The Lost Language of Gay Men" as Paul Baker has it in his wonderfully readable lexicon of that name, is the secret parlance through which gay men secretly communicated with each other during most of the 20th century. According to a recent article in the Guardian ("What brings you trolling back, then?" by Colin Richardson), it flourished between Oscar Wilde's trial in 1895 and the decriminalisation of homosexuality (in England) in 1967. Polari-speak is not so much "lost" now, as part of our common culture—witness "cruising", "cottaging", and even the most basic gay word, "camp". By the way, the next time you "cold-call" someone, looking for a positive outcome, you are speaking Polari.

If C is cruising, this could also account for the high numbers: Keynes, like other Englishmen of his time, was a big walker, and Cambridge is a grand place to walk, as is the countryside around it. London, too, is a walkable city, and, according to Matt Cook in his "London and the Culture of Homosexuality, 1885-1914", a city dotted in Keynes' day with a vast number of known pick-up spots. Green Park, for example, was heavily trafficked, as were Oxford Street, Piccadilly Circus, Regent Street, Leicester Square, and, if you were well-educated and preferred to be indoors, the British Museum.

But because "A" and "W" are most likely specific acts, not general ones, it's tempting to side with the Church historian and go with "cock" (sucking, or whatever). But I think I'll hedge here and choose "cop," which can include cock-sucking but could also just be kissing and fondling. Don't forget—Keynes did a lot of C; it's consistently his highest number.

Would Keynes have known these terms? ("Cock", by the way, doesn't turn up in the Polari lexicon, maybe because it was a common obscenity, not limited to gay men.)

It depends on how cutting-edge he was, how hip. I suspect he did know, because Keynes knew practically everything. He also was notoriously "naughty" in speech, sharing a love of obscenity with his best friend (until Lydia), Virginia Woolf's sister, the painter Vanessa Bell.

My further guess is that this coded list has nothing to do with the specifically named lovers recorded on the first list but instead records only anonymous sex, and that therefore C, with its high tally, is something that happened easily, often and surreptitiously. Why keep a lengthy, specific tally, indexed by activity, if you're doing "it" every day anyway with the same person? If most days you have a bit A and you don't have to resort to W, why bother to note it? Not interesting.

It makes more sense, as I see it, to keep a list of how often and under what circumstances you could possibly have sex, and then how often you scored. Seeking anonymous sex would be sort of like investing in the stock market (which Keynes did obsessively, trading daily before he even got out of bed): invest often, hedge and maximise your chances, hope for the best.

To buttress my theory that this second tabulated diary records anonymous sex (or attempts at anonymous sex), and not on-going sex with a stable partner, there is another, very puzzling number attached to each quarterly increment. First, Keynes adds up all the three categories of activities—"C" plus "A" plus "W"—and then he attaches a number that doesn't seem to relate to any of them. These numbers range from 65 to 100. Doesn't that sound to you like a grade?

Keynes was a young don, barely out of university, so my guess is that he's grading himself on performance. Most of his grades (if that's what they are) are in the 70s and 80s. That is, he attained pretty good sex but nothing to write home about. Only rarely does he award himself a grade of 95 or above (no grade-inflation here), but there is a 100 and there's even one 104. That 104 either disproves my theory or indicates a quarter-term of quite spectacular A+ sex.

What we do know is that, in the years Keynes was lecturing on economics at Cambridge, writing "Indian Currency and Finance", working on the book that later became "A Treatise on Probability", advising the Treasury in the run-up to the first world war, and (all this according to Robert Skidelsky, Keynes' principal biographer) speculating enthusiastically in the stock market, he had much more than a so-called life. You might say that Keynes was at least as invested in the sex market as the stock market.

(Evan Zimroth is novelist and poet, a life member of Clare Hall, Cambridge, and a professor of English and Jewish Studies at Queen's College, New York.)

  • Add new comment
  • Printer-friendly version

 

keynes

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on January 28, 2008 - 22:22.
c - child a - adult w - woman
  • reply

Keynes's code

Submitted by Jon (not verified) on March 30, 2008 - 14:48.
I strongly suspect "W" stands for mutual wanking. That fits in with the recorded frequency of the activity (assuming the letter does denote an activity). If solo, surely the number would be much higher.
  • reply

C.S.W. - P.O.V.

Submitted by BobNSF (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 00:00.
I think your heterosexuality is getting in the way of your analysis. Two men would rarely, and certainly not very often, stop at a "cop". Once we get copping, we usually proceed to something more satisfying. I suspect that "c" refers to cock(-sucking) and "a" to ass(-well-you-know). As for "w", it probably does meaning wanking but not as you interpreted it. I bet he meant that he w'ed the other guy or vice-versa, that the encounter did not go beyond that to "c" or "a". Especially given the times and the anonymous nature of some of the tabulated encounters, it's strikes me as quite likely that in a minority of them, conditions did not allow for anything more complicated than a good ol' mutual "w".
  • reply

C.S.W. - P.O.V.

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 04:44.
I agree with BobNSF. But there is a problem with the ass-wank-cock theory. Wouldn't someone that obsessed with numbers also want to record whether he took the active or passive role in the encounter? Of course he would. Unless, of course, he were a total top or a total bottom, in which case there would be no need to record the extra bit of data (just as there would be no need for a straight guy to do so). Ergo, JMK was not versatile. The only question is: was he a top or a bottom?
  • reply

this is so obvious to a gay man!

Submitted by Benny Lava (not verified) on January 30, 2008 - 21:36.
Yes, BobNSF has explained it so very well. Heterosexuals often don't appreciate the importance of mutual masturbation to gay men. I've even had a lesbian ask me "Now, do you count that?" When I related this to my partner, he suggested my joking response should have been "We keep a separate tally." Keynes obviously did just that!
  • reply

or maybe not so obvious

Submitted by Benny Lava's Partner (not verified) on January 30, 2008 - 22:00.
I went through the entire article thinking: C = Open mouth, giving oral; A = Standing man, receiving oral; W = Ahem, the butt; Don't beat me up tonight, Benny Lava!
  • reply

Keynes was bi, so . . .

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 7, 2008 - 17:04.
We have now a word for men who have sex with both women and men. Like much of Bloomsbury, Keynes was bi. A commonly used "c" word in Bloomsbury: "cunt." Performed more often during the vac because Keynes was around more women during the vac. Simple, no?
  • reply

Keynes Code

Submitted by mportala (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 03:24.
Are you sure the W doesn't stand for Women? I know many gay men and some of them occasionally have sex with women.
  • reply

Agreed. C(ock), A(ss) for

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 09:35.
Agreed. C(ock), A(ss) for men, W is for women. He did after all have a wife, and I doubt he just woke up one morning deciding he suddenly liked women. Of course, we'll never really know.
  • reply

I took it to mean: C = Cock,

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 19:43.
I took it to mean: C = Cock, A = Ass, and W = WIFE. And since it is a personal inventory, it would be what he got (cock or ass, or even wife) not what he gave. W could just be Women since this is a more private diary, all in code, it would be more apt to have all liaisons not including his wife.
  • reply

W=Wife

Submitted by Gebrelu (not verified) on February 5, 2008 - 19:53.
Cock, Ass and Wank because the numbers are too high for anything but a good proportion of anonymous sex (cottaging) and straight women generally not do that is it not safe for them to do so.
  • reply

Nobody seems very shocked

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 07:16.
Nobody seems very shocked that he states having sex with children. I am.
  • reply

Shock yourself to sleep, pal

Submitted by Benny Lava (not verified) on January 30, 2008 - 22:10.
How superior you must feel being shocked about something contrived by modern perverted imaginations about the goings on of 100 years ago involving a man dead for over half a century.
  • reply

statue of limitations

Submitted by Another Visitor (not verified) on January 30, 2008 - 22:41.
Since the boys are either 110 years old or dead by now, my statute of limitations on shocked-ness has passed.
  • reply

Children? What children? You

Submitted by Cate (not verified) on January 31, 2008 - 06:28.
Children? What children? You mean the 16-year-old and the two "boys"? 16 is age of consent in plenty of places, and "boy" can mean anything up to early twenties in this context. I appreciate your effort to point out the moral shortcomings of others, however. We need more of that.
  • reply

Boys

Submitted by Gebrelu (not verified) on February 5, 2008 - 19:59.
When I read 'jew boy' I did not think of a child. I assumed a liberal and creative use of the language (the theme of the article after all). If I go for a drink with the 'girls' after work ...
  • reply

C = child A = adult W = woman

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 07:24.
C = child A = adult W = woman
  • reply

CAW

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 14:12.
Could they not be locations? C(ambridge), W(estminster), A? Or C(ollege), W(ork) - London, A?
  • reply

Locations or type OR

Submitted by Jerrold (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 18:47.
Means of procurement? Cruising, Associate, Watercloset?
  • reply

I think your theory is the

Submitted by k. (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 20:16.
I think your theory is the closest one. C appears the most, and he did wrote about having sex with children in his other diary, isn´t that right? He still have sex with men (adults) and the least cathegory is for women, because although attracted to men, he had an alluring wife. He was probably bisexual.
  • reply

doesn't tally

Submitted by Nick (not verified) on January 31, 2008 - 10:06.
The first diary does not register sex with children, but sex with teenagers. It is today legal in most Western countries to have sex with sixteen-year-olds, and the word "boy" used at that time would most certainly describe a young man in the second half of his teenage years, and not a child. When the word "child" would be used only for pre-pubescent humans, "boy" would be used till quite late in life (as can still be the case). So I don't think it very likely that the C A W code refers to Child Adult Woman, although it is a neat assumption in its simplicity.
  • reply

c = coming? Is there some

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on January 29, 2008 - 17:44.
c = coming? Is there some reason that couldn't be the case?
  • reply

We're talking economics

Submitted by Scotty!! (not verified) on January 30, 2008 - 01:31.
We're talking economics here. C = consumption (don't want to think about what that means). W = wage, breakin' out the wallet for some utility. A = technology: gettin' freaky.
  • reply

C A W

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 4, 2008 - 08:31.
I think there is another possibility for the C and it is the obvious, most obscene of the C words. This reminds me of the gag about the blond who sees a child with an L and an R painted on his shoes. She asks the boy to explain them and he patiently explains that L is for left and R for right and this way he remembers which shoe goes where. "Ah!" says the blond. "That explains why I've got C&A stitched in me knickers!" So C = C**t A = Arse (and definitely not Ass, for Keynes a Biblical donkey. Or let's not go there.) W = Wank.
  • reply

Spelling

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 4, 2008 - 10:35.
Since this article is about an Englishman (and carefully contextualised by a trivial but indicativel snipe at British 'anti-Semitism') 'A' would, if it were so, refer to arse, an Anglo-Saxon word for the buttocks. Ass is a small animal of the horse genus. Keynes sex life is obviously more interesting ('inneresting') than the fact that at Bretton Woods and earlier in Washington this great figure in the history of economics ("St Paul" – J K Galbraith) was treated like the emissary of "a Balkan state" begging for a loan. He was turned down.
  • reply

The word 'ass' was

Submitted by Laurel (not verified) on February 19, 2008 - 01:06.
The word 'ass' was pronounced 'arse' by upper and middle class English people of the time. It occurs, spelt 'ass', in The Lord of the Flies, when the boys spear a sow 'right up her ass'. Another point, worse than imprisonment could happen for homosexuality; I know of a case where a married man caught cottaging was given the choice of inprisonment, and the subsequent scandal, or castration, which he chose... in the 1950s.
  • reply

Etymology

Submitted by Lexicographer (not verified) on February 4, 2008 - 11:39.
I have no firm suggestions as to what the letters stand for, but I'm pretty certain that W could not stand for wank, since that term was not in use in this period (Edwardian England). The usual slang terms for masturbation at that time were "toss" or "frig". The OED's earliest example of wank dates from 1948. C could stand for copulation, since that was the term used by Lytton Strachey for penetrative sex, but of course it does not indicate who was top and who bottom. If Keynes usually went bottom, A might stand for active; but since he married, it's more likely that he was principally a top. As for the numbers, they could just as easily be a reference to the size of the other party's penis: 65 could mean 6.5 or six and a half inches, 104 could mean 10.4 inches, giving roughly the range of penis size you might hope to encounter. If this is correct, you would expect to see more scores below 8, and steadily fewer above.
  • reply

Fine analysis, though I

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 9, 2008 - 21:43.
Fine analysis, though I think you're relying on some unwarranted assumptions in saying that "since he married, it's more likely that he was principally a top." Plenty of bisexual men enjoy active roles with women, and passive roles with men. If anything, Keynes' bisexuality suggests a certain openness to experience that would lead to sexual versatility.
  • reply

Nobody 1) keeps a sex diary,

Submitted by Jasper von Blowhole (not verified) on February 4, 2008 - 18:36.
Nobody 1) keeps a sex diary, and 2) keeps it IN CODE... to hide commonplace acts like blowjobs and 'copulation.' Oh heavens, he copulated, wouldn't the neighbors be scandalized? It's a very short list of precisely who on this earth doesn't copulate! He wanted these acts disguised for as long as possible to hide things that would embarass or shame him. Toss out the commonplace sex acts and go for kinkier stuff.
  • reply

A bit morbid, don't you think?

Submitted by Jellicle (not verified) on February 4, 2008 - 21:24.
That kind of tortured speculation on the minutia of a dead man's sexual history borders on the creepy. Honestly, it's like the people who go on and on about how Bacon wrote Shakespeare, only with blowjobs.
  • reply

Keynes

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 5, 2008 - 00:17.
Were "Aldaily.com" not my homepage I would never have known about this earthshaking issue! I haven't a clue as to why JMK kept such a diary. I presume his intentionality is unknown, or perhaps he referred to it elsewhere in some published document. I would be pleased to be so informed by any one with with such information. Having said that, I cannot understand the surely prurient interst there is in Keynes' sex life, and further more dare I add: who really cares. Perhaps some reader might enlighten me. mooseman01
  • reply

Typical

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 5, 2008 - 01:18.
Typical of Ms. Zimroth to focus her attentions on the prurient.
  • reply

Code

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 5, 2008 - 02:14.
I think you need to consider that w = wee...
  • reply

Keynes

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 5, 2008 - 02:59.
C is obviously not Cruising; that's a relatively modern Americanism, and Wanking has already been shown to also be a recently coined usage. Cock-sucking, Coming - see Cruising. Keynes was certainly a gentleman, in the older sense - see Virginia Woolf's diaries or the Stratchey biography - and although he may occasionally have indulged in spoken obscenity to be amusing, it seems very unlikely he would have used such common (again, in the old sense) terms to tabulate his sexual activities. He knew Latin and Ancient Greek, so perhaps a scholar out there can make some suggestions. C for coitus, perhaps? And might not the numbers refer to money paid for services rendered? After all, he was an economist.
  • reply

Greek and Latin

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 5, 2008 - 14:19.
Nice try, but there's no 'w' in Latin and Ancient Greek doesn't use the English alphabet. Can't someone solve this? It's maddening.
  • reply

C A W

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 6, 2008 - 03:24.
Colored Asian White?
  • reply

Grades / Marks... etc.

Submitted by Ben (not verified) on February 6, 2008 - 15:28.
Fascinating stuff. Two comments: A span of 65 to 100 might equate with a "grade" range in the U.S., but I'm not sure whether Keynes would have had the same association--or indeed if he even would have marked using a percentage system. I somehow doubt it. Even if he did, consider this: when I was at university in the '90s (in the U.K.), they gave both letter and number grades, but a 70% was a low 'A' rather than a low 'C.' Anything over 80% was pretty much considered an impossibility. I note that Professor Zimroth has taught on both sides of the pond, so perhaps he can clarify this point?! The piece reminded me of a passage in Virginia Woolf's journals (6 Jan, 1940), where she's recording a conversation she had with Lydia and Maynard Keynes about what she should and shouldn't say in her forthcoming biography of Roger Fry: "About Roger. 'Can I mention erection?' I asked. Lydia 'What?' M[aynard]. 'Stiff' (their private word). No you cant. I should mind your saying it. Such revelations have to be in key with their time. The time not come yet. Sodomy & the WC disinfected. Is he right, or only public school?"
  • reply

I'm not sure about CAW, but

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 7, 2008 - 02:59.
I'm not sure about CAW, but I suspect the large, supposedly unrelated number represents total orgasms per quarter: Cs, As & Ws + masturbation (unrecorded). If C+A+W generally averages out in the 20-30 range, the additional 45-70 per quarter sounds about right for a man in his twenties (judging by the few with whom I've discussed the subject).
  • reply

Damnit, you guys. It's blindingly clear

Submitted by Earnest Canuck (not verified) on February 7, 2008 - 08:25.
Keynes was also a great *writer* -- who was describing the *characteristics* of his various comrades, grouping them as Credulous, Asinine and Worried (for example), or Clammy, Ashen and Warty. Then he simply expressed the *intensity* of each punter's distinguishing feature as a percentile; "W 104", for example, would represent the groping of one very warty cottager. Hey, no charge, friends. Just took a bit of thinkin'. Pretty startling article. Is there a lot of this stuff goes on, in economics...? Is it really, you know, the *festive* science...?
  • reply

Very interesting, yet finally weak

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 7, 2008 - 22:48.
While this is a fascinating article and intelligently written, it nevertheless seems unconvincing. First, one even might ask how it is known that these cryptic diaries are about sex in the first place. That aside, the floundering uncertainty and somewhat stretched hypotheses do not persuade. One example: a hundred point scale that - oops! - includes a score of 104? That in itself should quietly shoo that theory aside. There is a lot of material here, but it's not up to a reader's poll to divine what the three letters in question signify. And if you're truly convinced they refer to the first letters of words, do some extensive lexicographical study, for god's sake.
  • reply

104 is only one data point,

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 14, 2008 - 16:51.
104 is only one data point, and is thus an outlier. Maybe he had an extraordinary experience that he had to quantify as better than the time he listed it as 100. Your point would stand if it was CONSISTENTLY higher than 100.
  • reply

Champagne

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on February 8, 2008 - 06:20.
This might work if he was an ingester (and connoisseur) of semen: Champagne, Ale, Water. Interestingly, his final words were, "I should have drunk more champagne".
  • reply

Just the three? A dreary sex life then

Submitted by Elizabeth Pisani (not verified) on February 11, 2008 - 12:32.
I spend my life coding sexual behaviour data (don't ask). I can think of all sorts of permutations not covered in these speculations. I suspect that the letters refer to the three acts/genres that were most salient to Keynes, whatever words he used for them. I've got codes for most feasible combinations of male/female/transgender/anal/oral/vaginal/receptive/insertive/ paid/unapid, and then all of those again with and without condoms. Don't underestimate the exciting life of a data nerd. For coding guides, see: http://www.wisdomofwhores.com/2008/02/11/tops-and-bottoms/
  • reply

Code

Submitted by P.A. Linurus (not verified) on February 12, 2008 - 11:38.
I gather Keynes chose the code because the form of the letters resemble the acts he means: C for the open mouth; A for penetrating; W for receiving.
  • reply

KNZN CODE

Submitted by Just Guessing (not verified) on February 29, 2008 - 01:48.
Would W have something to do with being a warger? That's an old Nordic term for someone who takes it up the arse. It's used in the Eddas, which are not written in English, but there might have been an English version of the word in use. A lot of sexual terms are highly conserved. Also, British homosexual men often engaged in "slicking", or intercrural sex, in which they rubbed thigh to thigh and/or crotch to crotch, with no penetration. Not every queer was a bugger. Could the C be from some version of either crural or crotch?
  • reply

FROM THE MAGAZINE



Read the complete text of the Spring 2008 edition



Read the complete text of the Winter 2007 edition



Read the complete text of the Autumn 2007 edition

RECENT COMMENTS

  • um...maybe you should do some research.
  • But isn't the broader issue
  • More Ukridge
  • My goodness. Am I a
  • Maputo Article
  • "Can intelligence emerge
  • Keep up the good work :)
  • Awesome
  • nonfiction
  • Barbara, last year i ate the


RSS: Fullposts

Intelligent Life | Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2007 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Terms and conditions | Intelligent Life magazine FAQs