Subscribe to Intelligent Life

RECENT ARTICLES


LITERATURE
Poetry slamming
A conversation with Siri Hustvedt
Love me, love my books
How dumb is your bestseller list?
"A Coney Island of the Mind"
Zilahy's "The Last Window-Giraffe"
Writing workshops
Herodotus and the oracle
"Things Fall Apart"
Book critics we like

MUSIC
The new boss of Proms
The playlist: Leonard Cohen
My "Rock Band" band
Orchestral pleasures in Abu Dhabi
Sparks perform everything
Rock critics we like
Letting Bach breathe (audio)
Bryce Morrison on Hattogate
Music as installation art
The Joyce Hatto affair

FINE & PERFORMING ARTS
A night of chamber opera
Micky Wolfson: the great persuader
Thank you, ancient Greece
Passion project
A conversation with Jacob Rothschild
Collecting collectors
Lift-off
Once upon a good deed
Watteau's moody surprise
"The Magic Flute" underground

FILM
"Brideshead" redeemed
Tribeca Film Festival
Watching "Shine A Light"
Martin Sheen for president
Smoking on screen
Film critics we like
East Germany on screen
I love the Oscars
Scott Burns
British Council film festival
"The Man from Earth"

FOOD & DRINK
Repasts: calves-foot jelly
Hélène Darroze
And with the snail porridge...
Glass warfare
Finally, a quiet meal
Insider trading: buying the right barbecue
Papa was an ice-cream maker
Become a Master of Wine
Goodbye Peroni, hello Pinot Noir
Tokyo food

ISSUES & IDEAS
Let's call it "atmosphere cancer"
Hidden depths
Recycle chic
What she's up against
Zaha Hadid
Notes on a nail salon
The letters page
Just marry him?
The science of humour
Nelson Mandela at 90

PHILANTHROPY
Does one abused woman = 100 abused puppies?
In pursuit of community
Robin Hood and the ARK
Your money or your life?
Donating to Afghanistan
One cause, or many?
Embedded giving
Giving for scholarship
Helping a beggar
Children and wealth
New Philanthropy Capital

PLACES
Global trading: apothecaries
Saskatchewan diary
Being there: Beijing
British pubs
Hit the hay
An outsider in the galleries
"The other Iraq"
The Texas-Mexico border
Travelling in south-west China
How to rent a lighthouse

SPORT
An Olympic game
Roof down, sales up
Cricket at Lords
Federer: dreaming of mastery
EURO 2008
World's sexiest brakes
Olympic memorabilia
Watch cricket
Marathon training
Remembering Munich
Against the London Olympics

TECHNOLOGY
Shall we play a game?
Nintendo, me, and your mom
Hanging out in Liberty City
The high art of "bioshock"
Robots get cuddly
Redesigning the dinosaur
Interactive clothing
David Weinberger
Ned Kahn
Swarming robots

MISCELLANY
Dress sense: sunglasses
The summer issue is here
Shocking pink
TV, theatre, pop culture critics
Are you being followed?
The spring issue is here
Sex diaries of Keynes
New York cabs
Benjamin Franklin
Hitler's digestion
Life as a handbag

Twinkle, Twinkle, Eurostar

Waterloo

“CHUNNEL” might be a word in the dictionary, but it’s colloquial usage never graduated beyond the generation that found it so clever. English prefers taking nifty hybrid terms from the streets, and in French, Chunnel sounds like a cheap Chanel knockoff, not a grand engineering feat. Today, the travelers who use the rail link between Paris and London simply call it “Eurostar”.

Riding through the longest undersea tunnel in the world makes me feel old because I still find it so new and amazing. The whole experience seems so Jules Vern-esque, especially the vague minutes of darkness when passengers are informed that we are now travelling some twenty-odd leagues under the sea. Yet the artificial lighting shows off all that is dated about Eurostar: the colour scheme is tired, the stained seats look tatty, and the formerly futuristic design now befits an amusement park ride. Exiting in London reveals painful dents on the front and side of the train, like the damaged hood of a teenager’s car. Indeed, the Chunnel opened thirteen years ago and my head must tick back through Mission Impossible movies in order to remember the first one I saw as a teenager--the one where the helicopter chases the train through the Chunnel.

On 14 November, Eurostar will leave Waterloo station for a new international terminus at London’s St. Pancras Station. The revitalized station will be the epicentre of modish, modern travel, so say the adverts. The transition is part of the new Railteam service, a fast transportation network connecting London with major continental hubs. Christened High-speed Europe, the rail system is a tad euphemistic (Italy, Portugal, and Spain are currently off the grid, as is Scandinavia). The new trains will travel at “European speeds” of 300kph and highlight how horrifically slow and dysfunctional the rest of British rail actually is. Travel time from London to Paris will be cut down to 2 hours 15 minutes, and taking the train from say--Birmingham to Frankfurt--will become a viable alternative to flying.

Eurostar is just one of many trains that will travel on this newer, faster track called High-Speed 1. Given the increase in number of cross-channel destinations, the term “Eurostar” might vanish from our lexicon completely. Travellers will merely take the “high-speed” and the chunnel that makes it all possible will be taken for granted--like Manhattan’s crowded Lincoln Tunnel or the Iron Bridge over Severn Gorge. For those of us who pine for slow-speed Europe, ‘tis a wistful thought--almost a personal affront. Out with the old . . .

 

  • Andrew Evans's blog
  • Add new comment
  • Printer-friendly version

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Eurostar

Submitted by Visitor on October 2, 2007 - 18:41.
Having a real fear of traveling the "chunnel" this well written piece makes me want to overcome my fear and hop aboard. Thanks! -David Mixner
  • reply

Tosh

Submitted by Visitor on October 3, 2007 - 21:08.
What a muddled view. Let readers decide for themselves on the tired look - http://tinyurl.com/23njtl and http://tinyurl.com/27j8gd. All the Eurostar sets were refurbished three years ago after consulting Philipe Starck. Some of the things he suggested (like white carpets, apparantly) were discarded, but he provided the inspiration. And what do you expect on a train, if not "artificial lighting"? Sunlight? In a tunnel? And lastly you're comparing apples with oranges when you talk of journey times of 2 hours and 15 minutes from London to Paris in the same sentence as saying that getting the train from Brimingham to Frankfurt is comparable to flying. There's one big caveat with that last bit - it would be comparable if you didn't have to change trains four times!
  • reply

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FROM THE MAGAZINE



Our Summer 2008 issue is on newsstands now


Read the complete text of the Spring 2008 edition


Read the complete text of the Winter 2007 edition


Read the complete text of the Autumn 2007 edition

RECENT COMMENTS

  • On Heine's conversion
  • I think you are totally
  • We want more and more Don Quixote today.
  • Correction
  • Wow, just wanna say so many
  • China can't win
  • Its an ok but not great way to measure
  • Dirty thinking
  • Uh, yeah.
  • Population statistics


RSS: Fullposts

MIL

Intelligent Life | Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2008 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Terms and conditions | Intelligent Life magazine FAQs