Subscribe to Intelligent Life

RECENT ARTICLES


LITERATURE
A conversation with Siri Hustvedt
Love me, love my books
How dumb is your bestseller list?
"A Coney Island of the Mind"
Zilahy's "The Last Window-Giraffe"
Writing workshops
Herodotus and the oracle
"Things Fall Apart"
Book critics we like
Memoirs of a nobody
Thomas Bernhard
Herodotus and bad fate

MUSIC
The new boss of Proms
The playlist: Leonard Cohen
My "Rock Band" band
Orchestral pleasures in Abu Dhabi
Sparks perform everything
Rock critics we like
Letting Bach breathe (audio)
Bryce Morrison on Hattogate
Music as installation art
The Joyce Hatto affair
The autumn IL playlist

FINE & PERFORMING ARTS
Thank you, ancient Greece
Passion project
A conversation with Jacob Rothschild
Collecting collectors
Lift-off
Once upon a good deed
Watteau's moody surprise
"The Magic Flute" underground
Jeff Koons in St James's Square
The future of Futurism
Bloomsbury ballerina
Hiccup in the Russian art market
Russians come to London
William Scott
Contemporary African art
In praise of short plays

FILM
Tribeca Film Festival
Watching "Shine A Light"
Martin Sheen for president
Smoking on screen
Film critics we like
East Germany on screen
I love the Oscars
Scott Burns
British Council film festival
"The Man from Earth"

FOOD & DRINK
Repasts: calves-foot jelly
Hélène Darroze
And with the snail porridge...
Glass warfare
Finally, a quiet meal
Insider trading: buying the right barbecue
Papa was an ice-cream maker
Become a Master of Wine
Goodbye Peroni, hello Pinot Noir
Tokyo food
The people's lobster
The mission: soufflé
Australia's wine country
Well-tempered chocolatiers
Sipping Cos D'Estournel

ISSUES & IDEAS
Hidden depths
Recycle chic
What she's up against
Zaha Hadid
Notes on a nail salon
The letters page
Just marry him?
The science of humour
Nelson Mandela at 90
Bright old things, Brian Power
Great bores of yore
Yes, we are bit boring
Bright old things, Betty Stevens
Are men boring?
Bright old things, Diana Athill
Bright old things, Leo Abse

PHILANTHROPY
Does one abused woman = 100 abused puppies?
In pursuit of community
Robin Hood and the ARK
Your money or your life?
Donating to Afghanistan
One cause, or many?
Embedded giving
Giving for scholarship
Helping a beggar
Children and wealth
New Philanthropy Capital

PLACES
Saskatchewan diary
Being there: Beijing
British pubs
Hit the hay
An outsider in the galleries
"The other Iraq"
The Texas-Mexico border
Travelling in south-west China
How to rent a lighthouse
Ireland and the EU
A Mauritania diary
Nordic classrooms
Total eclipse
Flea markets
Monks and tigers in Sri Lanka
Jaffa's vanished glory

SPORT
An Olympic game
Roof down, sales up
Cricket at Lords
Federer: dreaming of mastery
EURO 2008
World's sexiest brakes
Olympic memorabilia
Watch cricket
Marathon training
Remembering Munich
Against the London Olympics
American exceptionalism
Rugby World Cup 2007 (ii)
Rugby World Cup 2007 (i)

TECHNOLOGY
Nintendo, me, and your mom
Hanging out in Liberty City
The high art of "bioshock"
Robots get cuddly
Redesigning the dinosaur
Interactive clothing
David Weinberger
Ned Kahn
Swarming robots

MISCELLANY
Dress sense: sunglasses
The summer issue is here
Shocking pink
TV, theatre, pop culture critics
Are you being followed?
The spring issue is here
Sex diaries of Keynes
New York cabs
Benjamin Franklin
Hitler's digestion
Life as a handbag

NEWS FROM THE UPPER CLASSES

WHATEVER WOULD P.G. WODEHOUSE HAVE SAID?

Anthony Gottlieb, who wrote on hedonism in this month's Intelligent Life magazine, enjoys an obituary but wonders whether "Wodehouseian" is quite the word for an English aristocrat who lived neither wisely nor well ...

From our arts blog, MOREOVER

THE justly famous obituaries published in Britain’s Daily Telegraph—of which there are several anthologies, including volumes devoted to “Rogues”, “Eccentric Lives” and “Heroes and Adventurers”—regularly celebrate the lives of those who seem to have inhabited worlds that vanished long before they vanished themselves. Last week’s tribute, if that is the word, to Lord Michael Pratt, described him as “one of the last Wodehouseian figures to inhabit London's clubland”, and noted that “he will also be remembered as an unabashed snob and social interloper on a grand scale.”

The epithet “Wodehousian” is raising eyebrows, in this online newsgroup and perhaps in the more literary corners of clubland itself. The Telegraph reported that the late Lord Michael was ejected from a London club (ironically, it is called “Pratt’s”) following “a spectacular altercation with a waitress.” Do the sunny novels of P.G. Wodehouse—home to Jeeves, Bertie Wooster, the gentle Lord Emsworth and his prize pig—really have room for such an unpleasant character? Actually, yes.

Barmy Fotheringay-Phipps, Oofy Prosser and Gussie Fink-Nottle may have been largely harmless. But the voluminous works of Wodehouse are home to all manner of villains and reprobates.

The spineless Hildebrand Spencer Poynt de Burgh John Hannasyde Coombe-Crombie springs immediately to mind. Stanley Featherstonehaugh (pronounced “Fanshawe”) Ukridge was a famously scheming wastrel. Sir Gregory Parsloe-Parsloe was mischievous and mad.

And towering above them all in wickedness and absurdity there is Roderick Spode, 8th Earl of Sidcup, a would-be dictator who had toiled in earlier days as the proprietor of an emporium of women’s underwear. Spode was a less than affectionate parody of Sir Oswald Mosley, the leader of the British Union of Fascists, whose followers were known as the Blackshirts. Spode’s retinue, by contrast, sported Black Shorts, for the eminently sensible reason that the supply of coloured shirts had already been exhausted to furnish the wardrobes of other fascist groups.

There are countless gangsters and extortionists in Wodehouse’s world, though some have endearing traits: Bat Jarvis was, despite his name, a lover of cats. The fine example of Jeeves notwithstanding, even a valet (Spike Mullins) could turn out to be a thief. Sir James Willoughby Pitt turned to crime after he was thrown out of Eton (where the late Lord Michael got into a scrape or two during his days there, according to the Telegraph).

Alaric, Duke of Dunstable, the poshest of Wodehouse’s reprobates, was a frightful guest—worse, in all likelihood, than the late Lord Michael, of whom the Telegraph noted that “many hostesses tired of Pratt's failure to make anything but the smallest contribution to the house or staff.” In truth, every imperfection detailed in the Telegraph’s obituary is represented somewhere in Wodehouse’s pages. Even Wodehouse, though, might have balked at introducing a character with a name like "Pratt".

  • Add new comment
  • Printer-friendly version

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Intelligent Life?? Hardly!

Submitted by Visitor on September 13, 2007 - 11:15.
Wodehouse would not think much of a publication calling itself Intelligent Life especially when it misspells MISCHIEVOUS. It is the adjective form of MISCHIEF. It is pronounced MICHIEV-US not MIS-CHEE-VEE-US. It is spelled MISCHIEVOUS, not MISCHEVIOUS. Come to think of it, I"m not sure I think much of a publication calling itseln error.f Intelligent Life that commits such an error. [CORRECTED—thanks for the alert. RC]
  • reply

WHATEVER WOULD P.G. WODEHOUSE HAVE SAID?

Submitted by Visitor on September 14, 2007 - 06:20.
I read about the late Lord Micheal Pratt in The Telegraph. From the description there, he certainly showed Duke of Dunstable -like behaviours, particularly in arriving for a day and staying for weeks. The monocle and the snobbishness perhaps marks him as the "last Wodehouseian figures to inhabit London's clubland".
  • reply

An egghead who couldn't boil one

Submitted by Robert Cottrell on September 14, 2007 - 20:18.

Anthony Gottlieb adds (I post on his behalf):

In the interests of fairness, it should be noted that the London Independent has sprung to the defence of the late Lord Michael: http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article2956397.ece. Andrew Barrow contends, among other things, that Pratt's "effervescent sociability masked a formidably erudite intellect and enquiring mind", though his culinary abilities were non-existent.

  • reply

Wodehouse & Intelligent Life

Submitted by Visitor on September 19, 2007 - 10:45.
I doubt whether readers of either Intelligent Life or Wodehouse need the correct pronunciation of Featherstonehaugh pointed out to them. By the way, who did choose the name Intelligent Life?
  • reply

Wodehouse & Intelligent Life

Submitted by Visitor on September 21, 2007 - 13:00.
I fear that our American cousins might : in spite of their evident intelligence, many are perenially baffled by the more obscure English pronounciations.
  • reply

...or there are young adults

Submitted by Visitor on October 3, 2007 - 07:36.
...or there are young adults from foreign countries who are getting more involved, learning and are interested.. who yes, wouldn't mind learning the correct pronounciation. A bit of modesty wouldn't harm.
  • reply

...or Colonials

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on December 20, 2007 - 21:29.
And we Canadians also need a brush-up from time to time. Which shows what the Web has done for a column about "Wodehousian": P.G.'s original audience was purely British, or at most, one step of emigration removed. They needed no guidance on the Osythe/Toosey rule of pronunciation. But I'm reading Intelligent Life from far around the globe, and those emigrés were my grandparents. I *needed* that Fanshawe pronunciation.

Note to contributors: mind your multicultural audience. Define your terms. Let your literary allusions not be overly enigmatic.

  • reply

Ukridge

Submitted by Bill Cleere (not verified) on December 10, 2007 - 01:57.
Wodehouse indeed produced a decent crop of villains, but Stanley Featherstonehaugh Ukridge was certainly not among them. A rogue indeed, but quintessentially lovable. (...and yes, many of us Americans know quite well how to pronounce Ukridge's middle name. More to the point, though, many more appreciate the genius of The Master without even knowing how to pronounce *his* last name.)
  • reply

More Ukridge

Submitted by Visitor (Anthony Gottlieb) (not verified) on May 14, 2008 - 23:23.
Point taken. I have just re-read the Ukridge stories, and find that he is not quite as much of a rotter as I thought. I'd now describe him as lovable from a safe distance.
  • reply

More Ukridge

Submitted by Bill Cleere (not verified) on May 27, 2008 - 23:28.
Handsomely said, Mr. Gottlieb. Now that we are in complete agreement, I wonder if I might take the liberty of putting you in the picture regarding a matter which might redound to our mutual benefit -- that is to say, a loan of ten quid, which, thanks to a tip straight from the stable, I can without hesitation assure you will turn us both a tidy profit following Saturday's third race at Epsom.
  • reply

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FROM THE MAGAZINE



Our Summer 2008 issue is on newsstands now


Read the complete text of the Spring 2008 edition


Read the complete text of the Winter 2007 edition


Read the complete text of the Autumn 2007 edition

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Stop crying babies.
  • Struggling to understand why this made it into print.
  • Who's round is it?
  • I really hate smoking and am
  • I love languages, but I only
  • People don't go to writing
  • What a refreshing article. I
  • I never considered myself a
  • If I shut my eyes hard enough I get super rose-tinted blindness!
  • cool


RSS: Fullposts

MIL

Intelligent Life | Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2007 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Terms and conditions | Intelligent Life magazine FAQs