A SCEPTIC EVALUATES "FOOD, INC"

"Food, Inc" seemed like it was going to be a punitive film. I expected a lecture set against horrific images that promised to make my next burger slightly less tasty. It was the kind of film that appeared destined to be seen by a sympathetic audience, who would then go on to zealously recommend it to indifferent acquaintances.

I was wrong. For one thing, it is visually glorious, full of sweeping pans of farmland, shifting dunes of corn kernels and happily roaming hogs. Early footage of hamburger-serving carhops on roller-skates mix with hypnotic views of modern supermarkets (which, we learn, contain an average 47,000 products on their shelves). There are also clips culled from hidden cameras in factories (or on willing factory workers), and segments that capture both the beauty of American farmland and the cost at which these farms are run.

The information "Food, Inc" delivers is heady. It reveals the grim, insidious consequences of agribusiness: just what happens when multinational corporations take control of food production. The results are often sadistic for animals and shockingly unhealthy for consumers. This case is well served by Robert Kenner's even-handed filmmaking. He lets much of the images speak for themselves, such as his footage of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, a Hobbesian nightmare that manages to bring out the worst in both animals (tainted food) and people (hidden cameras show farm workers kicking animals). A more dogmatic and theatrical tone from the likes of Michael Moore or Morgan Spurlock would have overwhelmed this otherwise poignant film about what we buy and eat.

Anyone who has come across the work of Eric Schlosser or Michael Pollan (two of the film's primary voices) will find a familiar message here: big agricultural businesses influence food policy in America, ensuring that corn production is subsidised (and therefore fed to animals, who often get sick from it, and is in everything we eat) and that the federal Food and Drug Administration is more or less powerless to protect us.

But there's an emotional and intellectual difference in seeing these facts unfold on a screen, rather than just reading them on a page. Demystification becomes a matter of stifling nausea. After our tour of the slaughterhouses of the meat industry, we are subjected to a lingering shot of a package of bacon in a supermarket. Somehow that bacon is scarier than a summer's worth of horror films.

"Food, Inc", in theatres now.

~ MOLLY YOUNG

 

Film  FOOD & DRINK  News  

Comments

Dinner


Grocery stores are now turning into food asembley plants were consumers go in and pick from a variety of ready to eat or ready to heat food components to take home and place on the table. In other words they are becoming Grocerants. Most consumers do not cook them simply assemble meal s particularly Monday – Friday.

Food Inc.


Food Inc. isn't about food.It's about an agenda. This is reflexive anti-business ideology. This is wanting to impose extra costs on consumers to make them conform to the filmmakers' personal moral outlook. This is anti-choice arrogance.

Free country, free choice. Stay out of my pantry, my kitchen and my life.

Food, Inc.


The visitor who thinks this is about an agenda and wants "free choice" needs to get out more. I've been living in Colombia, South America for the last couple of years. Here, you can get pre-packaged, highly processed, "convenience" food-products if you want them. But they're expensive, and you can get actual food for a reasonable price. FAR more fruits and vegetables are available, grown locally, at prices so cheap it hurts to think about returning to the US, where food has become so expensive that the working poor are turning up at community food banks in ever increasing numbers. (Not because there's any scarcity, but because the cost involved in transportation and the way food is produced has skyrocketed.) Everything tastes better here - meat, chicken, pork... and the variety- oh my! And the taste doesn't come from added fat, sugar, and salt, but from the fact that it's real, highly nutritional food. You have to wonder how there could be such a stunning difference in the quality (and price) of food. Nearly every meal brings home to me how in the US, with no comparisons, and "organic" priced out of reach for most, we're so used to poor quality, mono-culture food, we don't even know what we're missing. Free choice? I think I lost that sometime in the childhood in the US, and got it back when I moved here, supposedly to a third world, backwater, god-forsaken, corrupt, war-torn, banana republic... Unfortunately, Colombians look to the US model of everything with awe, and are gradually adopting our agribiz methods. I guess I better eat lots of of great food NOW, because heaven knows how soon it will be only a fond memory.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.